Breaking

Showing posts with label Technologies News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Technologies News. Show all posts

Saturday, December 3, 2022

12/03/2022 05:45:00 PM

5G will arrive at one billion endorsers this year

5G will arrive at one billion endorsers this year

5g-will-arrive-at-one-billion-endorsers-this-year


5G reception is presently far outperforming 4G

A new examination from Ericsson expects 5G memberships on cell phones to arrive at one billion toward the finish of 2022, with suppliers driving reception in spite of international and financial vulnerability.



By 2028, the quantity of 5G memberships will pass five billion, as per Ericsson's report(opens in new tab), which would represent more than half (55%) of every versatile membership.

Universally, 5G memberships purportedly became by 110 million during the second last quarter of 2022 to stretch around 870 million.

Where is 5G development?

Arising economies are set to be the absolute greatest drivers of development. China had the most net augmentations to the 5G client base in Q3 2022 with 15 million, trailed by Nigeria with 5,000,000, then, at that point, Indonesia with 4,000,000.

In 2028, it is projected that North America will have the most noteworthy 5G entrance at 91% of the populace, trailed by Western Europe at 88%.

How does this contrast with 4G?

5G reception is tremendously outperforming what 4G oversaw in a similar measure of time. It required seven years for 4G to hit one billion supporters in 2016, in the wake of sending off in 2009.

Ericsson credited this exhibition to the quick rollout of gadgets from a few merchants, which might have prompted costs falling quicker than on account of 4G, as well as China's "enormous, mid 5G organizations".

Interest for 4G is still a lot of fit as a fiddle, notwithstanding. Memberships for it keep on expanding according to the report, becoming by 41 million during Q3 2022 to around five billion.

Nonetheless, 4G memberships are projected to top at 5.2 billion toward the finish of 2022, preceding declining to around 3.6 billion toward the finish of 2028, "as endorsers move to 5G".



Interest in 3G, which was sent off way back in 2001, would give off an impression of being hanging on by a thread - during the last quarter alone, 3G memberships declined by 41 million.


Monday, November 9, 2020

11/09/2020 07:21:00 PM

Work-life balance has gone down the pan since the beginning of the pandemic

Work-life balance has gone down the pan since the beginning of the pandemic

Work-life balance has gone down the pan since the beginning of the pandemic


(Image credit: Shutterstock / GoodStudio)

The coronavirus pandemic and subsequent rise of remote working have been a disaster for work-life balance, new data suggests.

According to a blog from software firm Atlassian, not only have staff been working longer hours since lockdowns were introduced in March but also fail to detach themselves effectively when it comes time to sign off.

In the US, UK, and Australia, the typical remote employee is functioning for quite 30 additional minutes every day. Although this might not sound like much, that’s a minimum of an additional two and a half hours per week - or roughly 130 additional hours over the course of the year.

  • We've built an inventory of the simplest collaboration tools immediately 
  • Here's our list of the simplest video conferencing services around
  • Check our list of the simplest project management software out there

Across all regions analyzed, the remote staff is both starting work earlier and finishing later, with many employees also making a habit of working into the late evening. In other words, the candle is being burned at both ends.

Switching faraway from work

The concern, consistent with Atlassian, is that issues that arise as a result of extended working hours will ultimately outweigh the advantages of remote working (e.g. greater flexibility, more family time, heightened focus), preventing employees from maintaining a healthy equilibrium.

“The grand (if unplanned) remote work experiment we discover ourselves in has been a boon for a few and a burden for others,” wrote Arik Friedman, Principal Data Scientist at Atlassian.

“Throughout this experience, I’ve sensed that performing from home blurs the boundaries between our professional and private lives, putting us in danger of burning out en bloc. But I couldn’t copy that feeling with facts, until now.”

Indeed, the firm found that quite half of the respondents said it’s now harder to take care of work-life boundaries, and 23% believe work after hours quite they want to.

According to Atlassian, companies will be got to check out setting strict policies that guard against potential burnout - regardless of how fanciful it will sound. These policies might include dedicated wellbeing check-ins, regular mandated breaks, and a prohibition on after-hours communication.

“Remote work is going to be a part of our lives to some extent for an extended time. The question now's whether we will find how to form remote work work - for everybody,” added Freidman.




Tuesday, August 25, 2020

8/25/2020 01:00:00 AM

Latest Update: Linux is now available on more Windows 10 versions

Latest Update: Linux is now available on more Windows 10 versions

Latest Update: Linux is now available on more Windows 10 versions

Microsoft expands Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 to Windows 10 1903 and 1909

Linux users will soon be ready to enjoy support from more Windows 10 builds to figure with.

Microsoft has announced it'll be including Windows 10 1903 and 1909 builds in support for Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 (WSL2), allowing the open-source software to run on more versions than ever before.

Previously, WSL2 users had been limited to the newer Windows 10 2004 or higher releases.


  • We've highlighted the simplest Linux distros around today
  • Best Linux apps: free and open-source software
  • Best laptop for programming: top picks for coders, developers, and sysadmins


Windows 10 Linux

"We heard what proportion you liked WSL 2 and wanted to expand its accessibility, and over a previous couple of months, we worked on bringing it back to 1903 and 1909," Microsoft Windows Servicing employees Ty Citrin and Mitchell Minkoff wrote during a blog post announcing the launch.

"We’ve heard great customer feedback on what percentage users have enjoyed using WSL 2, and therefore the primary goal for this backport is to form WSL 2 available to more Windows users."

The pair say that WSL 2 is, "a new version" of the architecture in WSL that changes how Linux distributions interact with Windows. Each Linux distribution can run as WSL 1 or as WSL 2, and maybe switched between at any time.

All the features for WSL 2 distros will now be available for a good larger user base, with the pair promising a full Linux kernel built into WSL 2.

They are also bringing filing system performance now on par with Mac and Linux speeds, improved supervisor call instruction Support for all Linux applications notably, and Docker Desktop support.

The update is merely for x64 systems because it stands, with users on ARM64 versions wanting to upgrade to Windows 10 version 2004 and you’ll gain full access to WSL 2.

The news comes shortly after Microsoft also announced it might be bringing graphics processor support to Linux on Windows 10 through WSL, with Nvidia, Intel, and AMD also announcing their support.




Source URL

Monday, August 24, 2020

8/24/2020 10:00:00 AM

Gmail: Google finally forced to patch serious Gmail bug after exploit published online

Gmail: Google finally forced to patch serious Gmail bug after exploit published online

Gmail: Google finally forced to patch serious Gmail bug after exploit published online

Google knew about the Gmail vulnerability for months before delivering a fix

Google has been forced to remedy a significant security vulnerability present in Gmail and G Suite email servers after an exploit was published online.

The vulnerability could have allowed an attacker to send imitation emails posing as any Gmail or G Suite customer, opening the door to an array of spear phishing and spam-based attacks - which could even be wont to smuggle malware onto the target system.

Google had known about the flaw for 137 days before issuing the fix but dragged its feet until security researcher Allison Husain published a proof-of-concept exploit code to her blog.


  1. Check our list of the simplest email services out there
  2. Here's our list of the simplest email hosting providers around
  3. We've built an inventory of the simplest email clients on the market


Gmail security vulnerability

The now-patched Gmail exploit abused two separate issues which, when combined, could have given hackers the keys to the metaphorical kingdom.

The first bug allowed attackers to send fraudulent emails to an email gateway on the Gmail and G Suite backend, then run a server to wave the e-mail through.

The second flaw created a chance to tweak email routing settings, allowing hackers to forward emails under the guise of any Gmail or G Suite user.

According to Husain, this second bug also meant malicious actors could bypass two highly restrictive email security standards: Sender Policy Framework (SPF) and Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance (DMARC).

“Due to missing verification when configuring mail routes, both Gmail’s and any G Suite customer’s strict DMARC/SPF policy could also be subverted by using G Suite’s mail routing rules to relay and grant authenticity to fraudulent messages,” explained Husain.

The security researcher claims to possess disclosed the difficulty on April 1 and notified Google of her intent to publish the exploit on Lammas. Once the blog went survive August 19, only seven hours elapsed before Google delivered the fix.

The patch was administered on the backend, which suggests no action is required on the part of Gmail users or G Suite customers so as to guard against attack.




Source URL

Tuesday, March 27, 2018

3/27/2018 02:13:00 AM

Bulletproof calls out MacTel for asking shareholders to accept takeover offer

After Bulletproof rejected a takeover offer made by Macquarie Telecom last year, the former has issued a statement to shareholders asking they ignore communications the Australian heavyweight has sent.


Australian-listed Bulletproof has written to shareholders asking they ignore a letter sent by Macquarie Telecom that "urges" they accept the offer it made to wholly acquire the cloud services firm.

"Your independent board committee maintains its unanimous recommendation that you reject the Macquarie Telecom takeover offer of 11 cents per share and disregard materials sent to you by Macquarie Telecom," Bulletproof wrote.

The takeover offer Bulletproof is referring to was made by Macquarie Telecom, on behalf of subsidiary Macquarie Cloud Services, back in November.

The Australian heavyweight made a AU$17.9 million bid to acquire the remaining 83.89 percent of Bulletproof shares that it does not own, at a cost of AU$0.11 per share.

Following the initial bid from Macquarie, ZDNet reported that the offer faced hurdles from significant investors, with Microequities Asset Management increasing its stake to oppose the deal, and Bulletproof co-founder Lorenzo Modesto saying the bid was too low and that his company's 12.6 percent stake would be used to oppose the deal.

The independent expert appointed by the board of Bulletproof to evaluate the offer declared in mid-December that the offer was "not fair and not reasonable", and low-balled Bulletproof's valuation by one third. At the time, Bulletproof told shareholders to ignore all documents issued by Macquarie.

"We understand that Macquarie Telecom has told shareholders that its offer of 11 cents is the only unconditional cash offer to acquire all of your Bulletproof shares. However, if Bulletproof shareholders feel inclined to exit their investment in the company now, you are able to sell your shares on market through the ASX," Bulletproof told shareholders on Tuesday.

"The closing price of Bulletproof shares on the day prior to the date of this letter was 13.5 cents per share -- which is materially higher than the Macquarie Telecom takeover offer."

Software firm Klikon Group Holdings -- trading as the Australian Centre for Advanced Computing and Communication (AC3) -- made its own bid for Bulletproof earlier this year, offering AU$24.7 million days after Macquarie's bid was formally rejected.

Bulletproof announced last month it had accepted AC3's offer.

"We are delighted to present the scheme to shareholders of Bulletproof, as it provides materially better value than the takeover offer announced by Macquarie Telecom Group in November and at an offer price that is compelling for our shareholders," Bulletproof chair Craig Farrow said in accepting AC3's offer.

"I'm confident that the combination of AC3 and Bulletproof should also be highly attractive to both our employees and customers, given the capabilities and strength of a combined AC3 and Bulletproof Group."

On Tuesday, Bulletproof again highlighted the AC3 offer as "materially superior" and told shareholders there is no action required until May when shareholders will be given the opportunity to vote at a scheme meeting.

"Subject to the conditions of the scheme being satisfied, the scheme is expected to be implemented in June 2018," the company added.

Bulletproof said it expects to post AU$1.45 million in EBITDA for the first-half of the 2018 fiscal year, a significant reversal of the AU$1.2 million loss made in the first-half of 2017, even as its revenue shrank from AU$24.5 million to a forecasted AU$23.1 million year-on-year.


Friday, February 9, 2018

2/09/2018 05:10:00 PM

Tony Robbins Breaks Down the Psychology Behind Business for Startups and Entrepreneurs

Business Execution Is Derived from 80 Percent Psychology and 20 Percent Mechanics



One of the most brilliant minds in business recently spoke with Inc. editor James Ledbetter on the psychology within the business.

Tony Robbins is known for his leadership seminars and classes that are taught around the globe. Robbins will often reserve several of his most valuable pieces of information during recorded interviews for his one-on-one courses.


His interview with James Ledbetter was an excellent conversation. The questions and answers were above par. As a business owner of a startup that is continuously looking for ways to refine growth, I found this talk to be extremely vital.

The conversation focused on the psychology of leadership.

“WHEN YOU ALLOW THE ENVIRONMENT TO CONTROL YOUR PSYCHOLOGY, YOU ARE NOT GOING TO WIN.” – TONY ROBBINS

One element of business development is financial management. Robbins describes multiple functions that business owners need to have to be financially successful.

Over the past two years, I have found out that success can be defined by completing goals. The next thing I have learned recently is completing personal goals is a personal success, but financial success is derived from completing financial goals.

After listening to this interview, I realized a metaphor to share with other entrepreneurs on business.

The Puzzle Metaphor

Picture a puzzle with millions of pieces that would be the size of a professional football field. Imagine trash bags filled with puzzle pieces. As a business owner without a mentor is trying to put this puzzle together without light. Visualize trying to put this puzzle together at night.

When I started this company in 2010, I was in school and did not have a lot of time to invest in development. When I finished school in 2015 and started a full-time job, I began to work part-time on the company.

"WATCH FULL VIDEO TONY ROBBINS"



In connection with my metaphor, after five years, I barely made any progress on the puzzle. In 2015, I really started to attempt to put the puzzle together. The vision of the business was still unclear. During the next two years, I made serious progress, but I was still working in the dark. In 2017, I finally decided to turn on the lights to field. With maturing, reading, researching and listening to business leaders, I was able to start to visualize the puzzle.

Also in 2017, I switched this site’s URL to an https to make it more secure. Metaphorically the lights went out, and Google dropped the site from their indexing. It took me six months to realize the lights went out on the field. My vision was blinded by a change in the business.

In early 2018 I was able to turn the lights back on the field and requested for Google to start indexing my site once again. Our traffic and growth started to boom. It feels like half of the puzzle is completed, but I am still learning to find out how to complete the puzzle. I relate completing the puzzle to learning all of the functions of being a business owner.

Watch this important interview between Inc. editor James Ledbetter and Tony Robbins.




2/09/2018 02:04:00 AM

IT budgets in Brazil to increase in 2018

Technology decision makers in the private sector remain confident, says research.


Investments in private sector technology will continue to increase in Brazil this year, according to research.

Of the 1,500 IT decision makers in medium and large-sized organizations polled by Brazilian analyst firm IT4CIO, 51 percent said their budgets will increase this year, while 23 percent will see a decrease.

It is expected there will be a 5 percent increase in technology budgets overall in 2018, the study says.

By comparison, IT budgets in Brazil saw a 3.1 percent overall increase in 2017, slightly over the inflation rate projected for the year, of 2.8 percent. According to the research, now in its thirteenth year, this is due to the decrease of 2.1 percent seen in government IT budgets.

In 2018, projects related to IT automation, cloud computing, data analytics, information security, artificial intelligence and Internet of Things will be prioritized, according to the study.

With the improvement of the local economy, investments in infrastructure refreshes will also grow in 2018, compared to the last three years when there was an overall investment freeze in that front.

But business will remain challenging for technology suppliers in Brazil, as 66 percent of technology decision makers will be looking at revising their contracts with their vendor base.

In addition, 19 percent of the CIOs polled said they will be looking for senior hires in 2018. This contrasts with 12 percent of respondents who said they will have to hire professionals at lower rates due to a lingering uncertainty.


SOURCE BY


Monday, January 22, 2018

1/22/2018 07:36:00 PM

Should you build your own NAS, or buy one?





Let's get one thing out of the way. If you're a person who always builds your own PCs or servers, this article isn't for you. If you're the sort who would always build your own NAS, go ahead. I'm not telling you not to.

Instead, this article is for the person who's really trying to understand the trade-offs, to decide what the best course of action is based on cost, effort, and other factors. If you're on the fence or just learning about how to manage your own storage array, read on.

I'll be honest. At this point, I've lost track of how much storage I have here in my home office. I'll tell you it's somewhere north of 150 terabytes, probably closer to 200 by now. Because of the kinds of work projects I've had to do over the years, I've always needed a lot of storage.

Until about five years or so ago, I always built my own. That process culminated in the media tank builds I did in the mid-2000s. These two machines each had ten drive bays, along with one boot drive. One tank was for live data, and the other kept backups of the primary server.

At that time, it was difficult to get a desktop size (or desktop budget) NAS that would hold as many drives as I needed to run. One machine had ten 1TB drives, while the second had ten 2TB drives.

Building them was fun, but challenging and a bit annoying. The big effort was sourcing all the parts. At the time, it was relatively easy to hang up to six drives off of one motherboard, but adding another five required some add-on boards. Making it easy to remove and swap the drives required two five-bay drive trays. I found some nice cases that had space for all the bays, but I had to do some cutting, drilling, and bashing to make it all fit.

Once everything worked, I had to set up the file sharing system (which was originally based on XP, then Windows 8, and then, finally, Linux). All in all, it was fun. But more importantly, I had the storage array I needed within the budget I could spend.

But then came the age of appliance NAS devices, like the Drobo and Synology machines. When it came time to add more storage, I decided to move to my first Drobo array. Setup was a cinch. Over time, I wound up purchasing four Drobos, both direct-attached and networked. I found that the ease of setup and the ease of maintenance was incredibly compelling, especially since I was so busy.

Eventually, the hand-made NAS boxes, the big tanks, got relegated to offline backup storage. By the time we moved to Oregon in the fall, those tanks had been offline for a few years and I realized it was time to take them permanently out of service.

Over the course of 2017, I had a chance to look at seven desktop NAS devices, including the Drobos and the best-in-show Synology machines, and it became abundantly clear that the era of incredibly capable and cost-effective appliance NAS devices is here.

At this point, I can't recommend building your own NAS unless you have a unique requirement that's just not met by an appliance NAS. However, as my review series showed, you can find an appliance NAS with just about any feature you could possibly want, including direct output to a TV, if you happened to want such a thing.

I recently tried to price similar components to what I was running in my home-built NAS boxes and came up with about $750. That's not all that much of a savings over the appliance devices, especially if you factor in not only your time but the energy costs of a bigger tower machine. The Synology DS1817+ costs only $850, with everything set up, configured, and ready to run.

Today, really, the only reason I'd really recommend you go out and build your own NAS is for the experience and fun of putting one together. That's still a very valid reason, especially if you want to gain familiarity with the technology and NAS server software.

But if you simply want to get and set up reliable storage, I'd recommend that you buy it. It will save you a ton of time, won't cost you much more, and the devices now on the market, particularly the Synology devices running Disk Station Manager, are exceptional. I have no plans to ever build another NAS.


Saturday, January 20, 2018

1/20/2018 01:13:00 AM

How much slower will your PC feel after patching for Spectre-Meltdown?




Intel made it clear that patching the Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities would mean PCs taking a hit with regards to performance, but the company has now published data on just how much of a hit systems will experience.

Intel has published both data collected from both users and synthetic benchmarks and the bottom line is that users will experience a real-world performance hit of about between six and eight percent, with systems running 8th-generation processors seeing a smaller impact than those running 7th- or 6th-generation hardware.

Factors can swing the results, for example, 8th-generation systems running SSDs see a smaller impact, older systems with SSDs take a bigger hit, and some workloads, such as complex JavaScript operations, are more badly affected and could see as much as a 10 percent performance hit.

When it comes to synthetic benchmarking, we get a picture that's a little more detailed. Again, the generalization that older systems will experience a bigger hit still holds true overall, but those different workloads can skew the results.

And there are a few of interesting takeaways from the benchmark data that Intel published:

The performance hit for the SYSMark 2014 SE Data/Finance Analysis test showed little in the way of a performance hit, which will be reassuring to business users.
Gamers should also breathe a sigh of relief, as the 3DMark Sky Diver test suggests that DX11 gaming performance is also largely unaffected.
The benchmark that showed the biggest performance hit was the SYSMark 2014 SE Responsiveness test, which showed a performance hits of as much 21 percent for workloads such as application launches, file launches, web browsing with multiple tabs, multi-tasking, file copying, photo manipulation, file encryption, and compression, and background application installation.





The results for the SYSMark 2014 SE Responsiveness test are particularly worrying, showing that, as I expected, the biggest effect that the Spectre/Meltdown patching will have is on web browsing and overall system responsiveness, and that means that many of us will feel that our computers are running more sluggishly after applying the patches.

A ray of hope in all this is that Intel says that it is "continuing to work with our partners in the industry to provide the best possible experience for our customers." Intel also says that it will publish more data on performance in the future.

For a more detailed analysis of the Spectre/Meltdown bug, I suggest reading this fine piece by Rupert Goodwins: Spectre and Meltdown: Insecurity at the heart of modern CPU design.

BOTTOM LINE?

The bottom line is that yes, you should install the patches, because to not do so leaves your system wide open, and that yes, you will see a performance hit, with older systems generally being harder hit.


Thursday, January 11, 2018

1/11/2018 12:50:00 AM

CES: Ring has home security system, cameras, lighting products on tap for 2018




Ring on Monday announced it would begin shipping the Ring Alarm, its all-in-one home security system this spring. Ring will sell a starter pack for $199, which includes a base station, keypad, contact sensor, motion detector, and a Z-Wave extender for $199. Ring customers will pay $10 per month for Ring's monitoring service, including 24/7 professional monitoring, cloud storage for all cameras on an account, and a small discount on future Ring purchases.

Customers can purchase additional components, such as more contact sensors for doors and windows, a flood/freeze sensor, and a smoke/CO listener. Of course, Ring Alarm works with Ring's camera lineup.

Ring Alarm -- originally named Ring Protect -- was scheduled to ship in October 2017, but ultimately was delayed due to a lawsuit with ADT, who accused Ring of stealing trade secrets. Ring and ADT have reached a settlement, prompting Ring to rename the product to Alarm.

Ring Alarm will compete directly with the likes of ADT and Nest, both of which offer security systems built with the smart home in mind.

In addition to a release date for Ring Alarm, the company also announced plans to release two new cameras this year. Ring's Stick Up Cam Elite and second-generation Stick Up Cam come with a redesigned look, with the Elite model capable of being powered by over Ethernet or a wall outlet. The standard Stickup Cam is still battery powered and works with Ring's Solar Panel Charger.

Both cameras can be used inside or out, feature 1080p HD video, two-way audio, and offer motion detection features.


A Ring Beams Spotlight.

Ring's acquisition of Mr. Beams will lead to new motion activated pathway lights, step lights, motion detectors, and spotlights integrated with Ring's platform as well.

Pricing and exacting release timing for the new cameras and the Ring Beams weren't revealed beyond sometime in 2018.




Monday, January 8, 2018

Saturday, January 6, 2018

Friday, January 5, 2018