There are a couple of steps through which you'll backup all of your emails - Know more

Many folks pass our entire lives without changing our email IDs but people that switch jobs frequently or use different software on a day to day and particularly college students who might need a backup regarding all their emails and projects after college is over for future references. 

In such circumstances backing up your emails, pictures and documents may be a necessary thing to try to do and also a sensible move. Though many applications provide automatic backup from time to time, one must skills to manually backup material available in their mail. 

If you employ Gmail which is powered by Google, there are a couple of simple steps which will assist you to download all of your emails but before you are doing it confirm to read the organization policy. 

Steps to backup your emails: 

1. - Log in to your Gmail account and click on on 'Data & Personalisation' on the left panel 
2. - Keep scrolling till you discover the section - 'Download or delete your data' and click on thereon 
3. - you'll reach the 'Takeout' zone, confirm you've got allowed it full access. Once you are doing that, you'll see an inventory of all the apps you employ and various options to download your data. Amongst those apps find Gmail.
4. - Tick the box beside 'Gmail' and 'All Mail data included' and click on on subsequent step 
5. - Choose your preferred delivery method and export frequency and click on on export. 

Google will automatically collect all of your data from your Gmail and other Apps connected thereto and email it to you once everything is prepared . you'll click on the file to download everything.

Source URL

These methods, alongside an encryption protocol, are often all you would like to stay important private files hidden and safe from any intruder's eyes.

It has become simpler to invade people's privacy as technology has advanced, particularly with digital data. Despite all of Microsoft's efforts to upgrade Windows 10, the company's main OS still contains elements of the old PC OS.

You can manage Windows 10 in unique and intriguing ways you'd haven't thought were possible, only by applying a couple of methods.

For example, you'll conceal a Windows 10 folder from File Explorer and make that folder and every one of the files it contains practically undeletable just by executing a particular combination of commands. That combination, alongside an encryption protocol, is often all you would like to stay important private files hidden and safe from any watchful eyes.

Here's the way to make a hidden, virtually undeletable folder in Windows 10

Users in Windows 10 are unable to utilize some protected data types as folder names. Microsoft has taken steps to plug the issues within the DOS instruction.

As a result, we'll need to believe in more traditional approaches to stay our sensitive files and data hidden within the system.

Creating and hiding folders is not any longer done using the instruction. Instead, we may do that with Windows File Explorer and therefore the Windows Graphical interface.

Step 1: Open Windows File Explorer and attend the folder or drive where you would like your hidden folder to be created. By right-clicking on a vacant space within the right-hand pane and selecting New Folder from the context menu, you'll create a replacement folder.

Step 2: From the context menu, right-click the newly formed folder and choose Properties. attend Attributes section at rock bottom of the screen, and tick the boxes labeled Read-Only and Hidden.

Step 3: Click the Apply button to use the attributes to all or any files and subfolders, then, click okay to finish the attribute modification.

These procedures also will make the files Read-only, meaning they can't be updated or rewritten without taking explicit efforts to reverse the settings.

Procedures for enabling access to the hidden folder and its contents are following:

Step 1: Open File Explorer and attend the View tab.

Step 2: Select Show/Hide Hidden Items from the menu and you will see a non-highlighted version of the folder.

Although a disguised folder name is not the best or efficient solution to hide sensitive data, it's better than doing nothing in the least. Security breaches to your hidden folder will demand deliberate and systematic action.

Source URL

A recent benchmark showing 'only' 11.5% gains is misleading

A newly uncovered benchmark for the Intel Alder Lake Core i9-12900K processor is making the rounds in the week, fueling speculation that Alder Lake-S is falling in need of the performance gains Intel promised during its recent Architecture Day event. That's not really accurate, though, since the benchmarks in question don't really show what critics are claiming it does.

The benchmark, found within the PugetBench Database by Twitter leaker Benchleaks, shows the Intel Core i9-12900K – the flagship processor for Intel's upcoming Alder Lake-S series chips – hitting its highest score of 1575 on Puget System's Adobe After Effects benchmark, which is about 11.5% above an equivalent benchmark for an Intel Core i9-11900K running on an identical system.

Intel said during its Architecture Day event that Intel Alder Lake will improve their new CPU's instructions per clock by 19% over the previous generation Rocket Lake-S processors, and clearly, 11.5% is a smaller amount than 19%.

We reached bent Intel to discussing the benchmark and a corporation spokesperson politely reiterated Intel's policy of not commenting on rumors and speculation.

As VideoCardz notes, however, the benchmark in question isn't a straight-up CPU benchmark – it shows how the whole system performs, not just the CPU. it's the primary benchmark we've really seen that uses an Intel Core i9-12900K processor though, then there are sure to be comparisons to earlier tests within the PugetBench database and many conversations around about what it all means.

Whether those comparisons are fair is vital, though, even as recognizing that 11.5% is smaller than 19% as far as percentage figures go as long as you strip the 2 figures of any of their context.

Analysis: This test result doesn't suggest the maximum amount as it's being made to seem 

We here at TechRadar test computers for a living, meaning that we run all types of benchmarks to push CPUs, GPUs, batteries, and other components to ascertain how well systems are built and provides an objective measure of how well those systems should be expected to run.

Benchmarks are important especially for comparing different systems, even those running equivalent hardware, since how a manufacturer builds its system can make or break its overall performance. As such, it's perfectly valid to match systems across generations or using different competing components like an RTX 3080 vs RX 6800 XT graphics card using their relative benchmark scores.

What you cannot do though is make apples-to-pears comparisons and treat it as if you were eyeballing equivalent metrics.

The PugetBench Adobe After Effects benchmark being talked about isn't strictly a CPU benchmark, it's designed to live the whole computing system against a coordinate system employed by Puget Systems to calculate an overall score. What PugetBench's benchmarks tell you is what proportion better a computer can run a given Adobe app than the coordinate system does.

In this case, we will tell that Adobe After Effects performs up to 11.5% better on the system running the Intel Core i9-12900K than it did on the one running an Intel Core i9-11900K, relative to a lower-specced coordinate system. 

The Alder Lake and Rocket Lake systems weren't entirely equivalent either. They were both using an RTX 3090 with an equivalent driver version, but they were running on different motherboards using different sorts of RAM running at different speeds, with no mention of the type of CPU cooling solutions used. 

This matters, since we see equivalent hardware producing some very divergent CPU benchmark results when running on different systems all the time here at TechRadar, something we note in our reviews where appropriate.

There is also a legitimate question about how well any third-party benchmark goes to live hardware components that haven't been released yet. How well a benchmark is optimized for hardware that does not even have official support yet can make a true difference in its scoring. this is often an enormous reason any pre-launch benchmark on engineering samples must be crazy an outsized grain of salt.

To test whether the Intel Alder Lake Core i9-12900K actually performs 19% more instructions per clock cycle than a Rocket Lake Core i9-11900K, you ultimately got to run a CPU benchmark designed to live a CPU's instructions per clock. There are benchmarks that do that , but the PugetBench After Effects benchmark doesn't give that measure its own distinct score if it fully measures it in the least.

Instead, you get an overall score of system performance, and you'll still achieve a 19% greater instructions per clock and not have it translate directly into 19% better performance. Intel only claims the previous, not the latter.

Moreover, that 19% figure cited by Intel is that the results of many, many tests averaged together, which suggests you'll have tests that show an 11.5% increase in instructions per clock and tests that show a 26.5% increase and obtain to a 19% average. you would like quite a couple of isolated benchmarks to say that a given chip is underperforming expectations.

We have always been critical of Intel's processors when things warrant it, and Intel's Core i9-12900K could find yourself disappointing us even quite the Intel Core i9-11900K did once we reviewed it earlier this year, but these limited benchmark results don't tell us nearly enough to mention that the i9-12900K is underperforming Intel's claim of 19% improvement in instructions per clock.

As Alder Lake's release gets closer, we'll see more relevant benchmarks shooting up online and we'll be ready to get a far better sense of where things are headed – and, ultimately, the sole tests we care about are those we run ourselves – but the claim that Intel somehow did not copy its claims after one series of semi-relevant benchmarks is extremely premature.

Source URL

Is the social media giant looking to integrate Messenger into Facebook again?

Facebook Messenger App

(Image credit: pixabay)

Years after removing direct messaging features from most Facebook apps, the social media giant looks to be considering their return because it tests the addition of voice and video calls to Facebook, consistent with Bloomberg.

Facebook users were previously only ready to make voice and video calls to other users through Facebook’s separate Messenger app when on mobile, but the testing will see some accounts ready to make these calls using the most app.

Facebook’s director of product management, Connor Hayes, told Bloomberg the the test is looking to streamline communication by removing the necessity to modify between most Facebook app and Facebook Messenger.

It’s so far unclear whether Facebook will bring the first feature of Messenger – text chat – back to the most app, but some integration of other Facebook properties have already begun to happen.

Instagram and WhatsApp are both owned by Facebook, and it's already enabled users to attach their Messenger and Instagram chats together since September last year. There’s also talk about connecting WhatsApp and Messenger chats also.

Speaking to Bloomberg, Hayes said: “You’re getting to start to ascertain quite a bit more of this over time”.

Analysis: are two apps better than one?

Facebook first removed messaging features from its mobile app in 2014, which meant users needed to download Messenger if they wanted to continue sending direct messages to other Facebook users from mobile.

While there’s an argument to be made for streamlining messaging back to most Facebook app, there’s also an honest case for keeping them separate. Facebook certainly isn’t what it wont to be – moving from a social media site where users shared text or status posts to at least one that now primarily sees users sharing links and viewing ads.

Some users should want to bypass the stream of stories, advertisements, and shared posts by using Messenger to speak with friends and family, while others have removed the most Facebook app from their phone altogether.

Data collected by SimilarWeb shows that while WhatsApp is that the messaging app of choice in most countries, Messenger comes in second, and is that the app of choice in countries like us , Australia, Canada, and France.

Either way, Facebook wins when it involves messaging apps, but the question is whether or not integrating Messenger features back to most app will help the business, or have users trying to find alternatives within the future 

Source URL.

No more driver updates to be piped via Windows Update

Windows 7 users are hit by some more bad news, with the revelation that Microsoft is not any longer supporting driver updates in the least through Windows Update for the aging OS.

This follows another recent move made by Nvidia, where Team Green discontinued core driver support for its graphics cards with Windows 7, and also Windows 8/8.1 for that matter (although any vital security fixes will still be delivered through until 2024).

As Bleeping Computer reports, support has now been ditched for Windows 7 (SP1) drivers being delivered via Windows Update, following the expiry of the SHA-1 Trusted Root Certificate Authority in May 2021. also as Windows 7, this is applicable to Windows Server 2008.

Naim Mohammad, Technical Program Manager at Microsoft, said: “On June 17, 2021, Microsoft will discontinue the publication of drivers to Windows Update for Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008, and Windows Server 2008 R2.”

However, note that business users paying for the ESU or Extended Security Update program (which will continue until July 2022) will still be ready to deploy Windows 7 drivers via WSUS (Windows Server Update Services).

Microsoft explains that the piping of drivers to Windows 7 has been ceased because with the aforementioned expiration of SHA-1 certificates, partners who are delivering their drivers through the Microsoft Trusted Root Program could deploy SHA-2 signed drivers instead – but these are incompatible.

If they made their way through to Windows 7 devices from Windows Update, that would cause serious issues including ‘degraded functionality’ or indeed totally bricking the machine so it doesn’t boot. As Microsoft notes: “Unpatched systems will have code integrity failures when presented with an SHA-2 signed driver.”

So to avoid any potential nasty side effects like this, Microsoft is not any longer allowing SHA-2 signed drivers to be delivered via Windows Update, so driver updates are effectively now pack up.

Official support for Windows 7 ended at the beginning of 2020, a year and a half ago now, so consumers still using Windows 7 – or businesses not paying for extended security support – should, of course, be moving on to Windows 10 (soon to be Windows 11) by now (or switching elsewhere, perhaps finding out Linux distros). Yet going by some reports, a surprising amount of PC owners are sticking with Windows 7, which ground will only get rockier going forward.

 

Read on for our detailed analysis of every Medical Alert with GPS tracking

We all wish to enjoy the good outdoors once in a while , even those that only take a brief stroll to enjoy the seasonal changes.

But for seniors or others with medical issues, leaving home without a way to remotely summon help could easily become a significant issue.

Having a tool to summon assistance is useful, but having a GPS-enabled device is critical if you aren’t sure of your exact location. And, for those with cognitive difficulties, getting lost may be a genuine problem that extreme weather and temperature changes could turn life-threatening.

We’ve collected the simplest medical alert devices that relay GPS location information to people who got to know where you're once you need help most.

Get medical alert systems that transcend basic fall detection

Want your company or services to be added to the present buyer’s guide? Please email your request to desire.athow@futurenet.com with the URL of the buying guide within the subject line.

Bay Medical Alert with GPS

(Image credit: Bay Medical)

Be found once you got to be

Fall Detection: Yes

Requires Mobile Phone: No

Subscription: Yes

Wearable: No

+Professional support team

+4G offers more accurate GPS

+No phone needed

-Fall detection costs extra

Bay Alarm Medical offers some elegant technology linked to a support service with a superb reputation. The 4G LTE GPS Help Button is one of its latest products and joins a spectrum of devices designed to bring help to people.

Available in black and white colors, the assistance Button uses 4G mobile technology to determine a communication link to the support center do you have to need help. And, the support team can alert carers or emergency services to your exact location in order that help can come on to you.

And, for carers to stay an eye fixed on where the owner is at any time, they supply a phone app with live GPS tracking.

The Help Button costs just $79, although it requires a support subscription that starts at $24.95 per month for the quality service. Caregiving tracking requires the well-liked Protection plan, at $29.95, and fall detection is merely included on the $39.95 Premium Protection plan. 

Our only real concern about this product is that fall detection is merely available with the premium service, and we’d wish to see it as a typical feature.

A phone that brings help fast

Fall Detection: No

Requires Mobile Phone: No

Subscription: Yes

Wearable: No

+Made for seniors

+5Star service

+GPS tracking

-Only works within the US

-AT&T only

Great call currently has two phone options, the favored Jitterbug Smart2 and therefore the smaller Jitterbug Flip. Of these, the Flip is simpler to pocket and comes with a charging dock that permits it to be easily used as a bedside clock.

But what makes the Jitterbug Flip potentially lifesaving is that the core phone electronics and interface are redesigned for those with poor eyesight, and to supply single-button access to Greatcall’s 5Star emergency help service.

Should the owner have a fall or other difficultly, they will simply open the phone and hit the large ‘5Star’ button and they’ll be connected to a Great call urgent response Agent. they will confirm your location supported the GPS within the Flip, evaluate your situation and obtain help to you 24/7.

And, you'll use it to call and text friends and family, like any mobile.

The Jitterbug Flip costs just $74.99, and therefore the helpline service plans start at $19.99.

This solution is merely available within the USA and can only add a location with access to the AT&T mobile network.

Two for the worth of 1 

Fall Detection: Yes

Requires Mobile Phone: No

Subscription: Yes

Wearable: Yes

+Two devices included

+No landline or cellular contract needed rated service

-Fall detection costs extra

-US-based Emergency Response

MobileHelp has some excellent products for seniors, and therefore the Mobile Duo may be a unique offering for people who want an alert system with GPS tracking.

As the naming hints, this product is meant specifically for 2 seniors and provides each with a water-proof alert button which will bring help quickly.

These don’t recall a landline-connected base station to figure, as they each have mobile electronics that connect via the AT&T network.

Once the alert button is pressed the wearer can begin a two-way conversation with a MobileHelp emergency operator, who can get them the assistance they have.

The cost of this service starts at $44.95 per month, but reductions are available with longer contract periods. The alert equipment is provided as a part of the contract, and you'll cancel any time.

For a further $10 per month, a fall detection device is out there. We’d prefer that they merged this into one device, but currently, they're separate.

What’s best about this solution is that the very high reputation of the service that the corporate is understood , and the way they channel the aware of emergency services, neighbours or relations as appropriate.

For those single seniors, MobileHelp features a Solo product option.

The discrete low-cost option

Fall Detection: No

Requires Mobile Phone: No

Subscription: No/Yes

Wearable: Yes

+Low cost

+GPS tracking

+Heart monitor

-Only uses GSM networks

To anyone seeing the CPR Guardian II on a senior's wrist will assume it's a watch, and they’d be partly correct.

It used a wearable technology platform that has been pre-configured to supply a cardiac monitor, location tracking, and an emergency call solution.

Carers and family can download the CPR Guardian App, and once the device and app are linked, the GPS location of the wearer are often tracked and any alerts routed to the remote mobile.

What sets this device aside from others is that a contract isn’t mandatory, and it's possible to use it without one.

You can prefer to have a monitored 34/7 service connected to the device, which costs £39.99 a month within the UK, and under contract, the CPR Guardian Watch is included gratis.

Or, if you simply want to be ready to alert relations, you'll make a one-off single payment of £199 and use a PAYG mobile sim.

You can find an equivalent device on the US Amazon.com for $249.99, and a few US-based services support it. However, we wouldn’t recommend it for US customers, because it relies on a 2G mobile network that uses GSM. And, that isn’t something that you simply can believe since AT&T turned its 2G network off in 2017.

Peace of mind for active seniors

Fall Detection: Yes

Requires Mobile Phone: No

Subscription: Yes

Wearable: Yes

+Works with Alexa

+Small and straightforward to wear

+Charging lasts five days

-Relies on AT&T mobile services

-Only available within the USA

-Fall detection costs extra

LifeStation offers both home alert solutions and people designed for more active seniors who wish to enjoy the outside or traveling.

Its Mobile GPS Medical Alert System is specifically designed to bring assistance to those far away from their home. and will the worst happen, it can locate its exact geographic location accurately using either WIFI signal or GPS satellite system?

The lightweight device is worn around the neck or on a wristband and contains an AT&T mobile SIM which will connect the owner to a licensed care specialist in moments once the alert button is pressed.

One unique feature of this design is that LifeStation has crafted an Alexa skill, enabling Alexa to inform you where the pendant wearer is that if asked.

By default, it doesn’t include fall detection, but this is often an option you'll specify once you order the service.

The only limitations of this device are that it uses AT&T mobile services and thus won’t work outside the USA or in locations that this provider doesn’t offer coverage.

LifeStation features a wide selection of plans that start at $34.95 for GPS trackable devices, and you'll add extra buttons to a home or fall detection as needed easily.