Dump JavaScript for faster Web loading? Let the debate begin

An ‘HTML6' proposal to hurry website masses gets a skeptical reaction from Associate in Nursing Associate in Nursinggular.js author.

Can Web pages load faster if they're not bogged down by slow JavaScript response times? A Web developer in the online publishing space believes this could be the case and has offered a plan for this purpose, but a co-author of the popular Angular.js JavaScript framework has his doubts.

A proposal entitled "HTML6 proposal for single-page Web apps without JavaScript" has been circulating on a World Wide Web Consortium mailing list and GitHub. "The overall purpose is to reduce response times when loading Web pages," said Web developer Bobby Mozumder, editor in chief of FutureClaw magazine, who authored the proposal.

"This is that the distinction between a 300-millisecond page load versus ten milliseconds. The quicker you're, the higher folks area unit getting to feel regarding exploitation your web site." (The use of the term "HTML6" could be a just theoretical naming at now, with the WC3 not even developing something known as HTML6 at this juncture. )

The intention would be for browsers to implement via markup language a regular style pattern for loading content. Users get to dynamically run single-page net apps while not JavaScript, and markup language becomes a templating language, with content residing in model objects. 

But Misko Hevery, Angular.js author, has his doubts regarding Mozumder’s proposal. "My total wild guess is that the globe is moving toward additional process power, not less, therefore any proposal that offloads work from the shopper isn't aligned with wherever the globe is heading," aforementioned Hevery.

Mozumder, in turn, said, "At the terribly least, the shopper application currently doesn’t ought to transfer an enormous JavaScript framework with this proposal." 

Analyst Michael Azoff of gamete likeable the proposal's intent. "The aim is to boost load time, that appears like a decent plan," he said. "It conjointly says this approach are outside the DOM, therefore perhaps the DOM desires extending [or] evolving."

See More :- Infoworld