Breaking

Friday, July 14, 2017

AMD reveals Ryzen Threadripper specs and pricing

AMD reveals specs, valuing, and accessibility subtle elements for its Ryzen Threadripper 16-center, 32-string and 12-center, 24-string silicon, and you're taking a gander at a sparing of up to $1,000 contrasted with the identical Intel chip.


AMD has disclosed specs, estimating and accessibility of the eagerly awaited Ryzen Threadripper processors. 

Two processors in the range have been disclosed. 

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, which will have 16-centers/32-strings and keeps running at 3.4 GHz (4.0 GHz in accuracy help mode) will be valued at $999, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which has 12 centers/24 strings and runs 3.5 GHz (4.0 GHz in exactness support mode) will retail for $799. 




AMD Ryzen Threadripper 

These costs are considerably less expensive than the comparable Intel silicon. 

Doing the math here, these costs imply that the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X will cost $700 not as much as the comparable Intel Core i9-7960X chip, and an astounding thousand dollars under 18-center/36-string Core i9-7980XE. 

At the more unobtrusive end of the range (in the event that you can call it that) the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X expenses $400 not as much as Intel's Core i9-7920X, and $600 not as much as the Core i9-7940X. 

The two chips will be dispatched opened for simplicity of overclocking, and both will utilize AMD's new Socket TR4, and will include quad channel DDR4, and highlight 64 paths of PCI Express. 

Both the chips and motherboards are slated to be accessible in August, with Alienware Area-51 Threadripper Edition framework pre-orders beginning July 27.




AMD has likewise lifted the top on the specs and accessibility for Ryzen 3 desktop chips. These are 4-center/4-string, Zen-based processors accessible in two desktop models. 

The Ryzen 3 1300X keeps running at 3.5 GHz (3.7 GHz support), and the Ryzen 3 1200 has a base clock of 3.1 GHz (3.4 GHz help). 

The two models are required to be on racks worldwide on July 27.

No comments:

Post a Comment